Bradford Council warned about costs as child takes first step to make them pay.

Bradford Council is facing a double whammy after permission was given to challenge its failure to properly fund the care of a child by her grandmother.

Leave has been granted by His Honour Judge Langan QC to bring a judicial review against the council.

A child, who cannot be named for legal reasons, came to live with her grandparents in February 2007. Social Services asked the grandparents to care whilst the mother was assessed by them. The assessment concluded that the mother’s chaotic lifestyle and drug use meant she was having a negative and detrimental effect on the child’s upbringing.

Nigel Priestley, Senior Partner at Ridley & Hall, Huddersfield, specialises in working with grandparent carers. He commented

“By April 2007 it was clear to Bradford that the mother couldn’t meet her child’s basic needs. The council started paying towards the child- minding costs. Bradford had legal responsibilities towards the child but, typical of many local authorities, it tried to get rid of these duties. It pushed the grandmother to apply for a Residence Order. They could then have washed their hands of the child. Thankfully the grandmother sought legal advice and the application was stopped. It’s vital first to get the council to accept its’ responsibilities and start talking of how they will support the placement.”

He went on:

“What happened next is doubly shocking. First Bradford stopped paying anything for the child’s support. Secondly when we started writing to Bradford, they simply ignored our letters. We first contacted the council in April 2008 looking for answers and asking for documents. 1 ½ years later I am still waiting.”

He went on

“More than 200,000 children are living away from their parents and being raised full time by grandparents or other relatives. According to a recent study by the charity Grandparents Plus, 93% of children are in the care of relatives due to abuse, neglect, parental drug or alcohol misuse or domestic violence”

“I am a Trustee of Family Rights Group. Experience from FRG’s national advice line confirms research studies that family and friends carers are living in financial hardship. Grandparents Plus's survey reveals that 66% of family and friends carers are on a weekly net income of less than £300, one in four also cares for an older or disabled relative and 80% describe themselves as "isolated" or "worried". The grandparents challenging Bradford in this case would certainly fall into this category.”

“New analysis by Family Rights Group shows that many grandparents and other relatives are left to struggle on their own both financially and practically. The vast majority (69%) of local authorities do not have a written coherent approach to family and friends care, and only 10% are committed to providing family and friends carers of children the same level of non-financial support as unrelated foster carers. Who knows what Bradford’s policy is – they simply don’t answer letters to tell us!”

His Honour Judge Langan QC has warned Bradford that this failure to engage in “any meaningful correspondence” places the council “at serious risk of an adverse costs order”. This means that not only will Bradford have a bill for back pay. They may also have to meet the legal fees.

Commenting the grandmother said

“My granddaughter is a difficult child, damaged by her mother’s neglect. I love her but I made it clear to Bradford that our financial circumstances would make it difficult to care without their financial support. They turned the financial tap on a little far a short time – then switched it off without telling us why. Now they’ll have to explain themselves in court and it will costs the council tax payers of Bradford even more money.

For further information please click here to contact Nigel

For further information on the challenges facing family carers in Bradford contact The Bridge Project

<< back